Conflicts will cost us now, and in the future

Thursday, July 07, 2022
Our News

Several regions have approached famine since 2017, but early response by humanitarian agencies has enabled the delivery of food assistance so actual famine was averted.   

Nyambura Githaiga

When Abdirashid was 26 months old, he had a high fever and began rapidly losing weight. “We really had nothing to feed him,” shared his mother Nimco. The Somali family had lost their farm and livelihood because of conflicts and a devastating drought. They are just a few of the 100 million people forced to flee their homes because of violent conflicts around the globe. 

Right now, many around the world are looking at the war in Ukraine, the effects of which have rippled around the globe. Here in Canada, the price at the pumps and the cost of food are steadily climbing – a little taste of the high cost of war. The highest costs of war are being paid by people’s lives, their homes, and much more than we can imagine. 

Armed conflict is the leading cause of today’s soaring global hunger crisis.  

Over 100 days in Ukraine.  

Over seven years in Yemen.  

Over a decade in Syria.  

There has also been armed conflict or violence over the last decade in several other countries including South Sudan, Myanmar, Haiti, Colombia and Somalia.  

Before the war in Ukraine, global hunger was already at critical levels. In 2021, 72 percent (139.1 million) of the 193 million people experiencing acute hunger and needing food assistance were in 24 countries where conflict was the major driver of hunger.   

Conflict causes hunger both directly and indirectly.  

Conflict directly causes hunger by disrupting access to, and availability, of food. And when illnesses strike at bodies already weakened by a lack of nutrition, it is devastating. “I could see how he became skinnier and weaker,” Nimco remembers the suffering of her middle child. “I was frustrated on what to do next, nothing seemed to work. 

When conflict or violence breaks out, those in the vicinity can no longer safely move around to get food. For many, the insecurity also means no income to buy food, which may already be in short supply with farmers not being able to safely grow or harvest food and keep livestock.   

In Yemen, civilians have been denied food or not able to access humanitarian assistance, due to the ongoing conflict. Photo: ADRA Yemen

Conflict is also a direct cause of hunger when fighting parties refuse to allow the safe delivery of food assistance to those in need. For example, in Yemen, the different parties in the conflict have reportedly either denied food to get the population to surrender or have diverted humanitarian food assistance. In May 2018, the UN Security Council adopted a resolution that threatened sanctions for those guilty of starving civilians in war.

Famine is the extreme case of hunger. When a famine is declared, people are already dying. It is too late to save those lives, but humanitarian response can save the others at risk. Since 2010, there have been two famines in conflict-affected countries. First in Somalia in 2011, then in South Sudan in 2017. There is a global system to warn when there is a risk of famine in a region. Several regions have approached famine since 2017, but early response by humanitarian agencies has enabled the delivery of food assistance so actual famine was averted.   

Conflict also causes hunger indirectly. The war in Ukraine provides a clear example of this. The indirect impacts of the war have shaken a global economy significantly supplied by grain, fertilizer and energy exports from Ukraine and Russia. Food prices around the world are going up, tied to the rising price of grain and energy, and concerns that the rising price of fertilizer will reduce food production next year.  

This is bad news for the hundreds of millions requiring food assistance to survive. Not only will humanitarian agencies face higher costs of food, but it will be more expensive to get the food to those who need it most. While humanitarian needs have almost doubled in the last five years, the resources to respond have not. For example, despite Yemen being on a fifth consecutive year of famine alerts, a recent UN pledging conference raised less than a third of the funds needed to respond.  

Acute malnutrition rates have risen, as has the number of hungry people in the world and the number of people facing emergency famine conditions in 2022. Photo: Tearfund Canada/Brian Ongoro

Imagine you regularly had less than a third of your budget to feed your family. Should everyone eat less? Should you sacrifice quality or nutrition and buy the cheapest food? Should the adults skip some meals so the children can eat more? Do you go into debt, just for enough food? These are the hard questions that people are grappling with in this hunger crisis. 

Not responding quickly and generously to the global hunger crisis will cost us. In the short term, people will go hungry, they will be more prone to disease because they will be malnourished, some will starve to death. In the medium to long term, some will experience famine, even more will die and the hungry children who survive will face a dimmer future.  

If we choose to let people go hungry today, we’ve chosen a bleaker future for the next generation. But we can choose to make a difference. In Somalia, Abdirashid was admitted into a program supported by Canadian Foodgrains Bank. Run by Development and Peace’s partner Trócaire, the two-year-old boy received ten weeks of treatment that included medication and therapeutic food supplements. Two weeks after leaving the health centre, Nimco shared that, “Abdirashid has no problem now and is happily playing.” 

As we give more to save more lives today, we must also advocate for peace and do all that we can to end the conflicts that are forcing people into hunger faster than we can feed them.  

Nyambura Githaiga is a senior policy advisor on Humanitarian Food Assistance at the Canadian Foodgrains Bank. 

Share this story